Poll:Translation system
From DeSmuME
(Difference between revisions)
(→Votes) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
* Of course, I give my vote to my own system :) [Guillaume] | * Of course, I give my vote to my own system :) [Guillaume] | ||
+ | ''* your vote here'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Remove translations == | ||
+ | === Pros === | ||
+ | * Great simplification of everything | ||
+ | === Cons === | ||
+ | * Lose some people that could get involved | ||
+ | === Votes === | ||
+ | * I would almost vote for that [Luigi__] | ||
''* your vote here'' | ''* your vote here'' | ||
Latest revision as of 17:03, 8 April 2009
We need to decide what system we'll use for translating the Win32 port of DeSmuME.
Don't forget to add your name when voting! :P
Contents |
Multilingual resource file (current system)
Pros
- doesn't require making all the static textboxes dynamic in dialogs
Cons
- adding a new dialog or making a new translation is a pain
Votes
* your vote here
Gettext (like PCSX2)
Pros
- portable
- simple (you just have tu use gettext("string") instead of "string"
Cons
- dealing with the language names can be a pain
Votes
* your vote here
Resource DLLs (like iDeaS)
Pros
Cons
- same as the current system
Votes
* your vote here
Mini18n (by Guillaume)
Pros
- made to be portable: works on both linux and windows and should be easy to port to other systems
- made to be easily embeddable as a static library
- use somehow the same interface than gettext, translating a string is just a matter of using _("some string") instead of "some string"
- provide UTF-16 on windows with the _16 macro
Cons
- doesn't provide a way to translate resource files, so we would have to either find a way to handle the resource files or build the whole GUI "dynamicaly" instead of reading it from resource files
Votes
- Of course, I give my vote to my own system :) [Guillaume]
* your vote here
Remove translations
Pros
- Great simplification of everything
Cons
- Lose some people that could get involved
Votes
- I would almost vote for that [Luigi__]
* your vote here
Other
Votes
* your vote here, alongside a description of your idea
Thank you for voting! :)
- <zeromus> one point: we may want to try and port some simple config windows to gtk. If we decide we like that, then we will want to have chosen a translation system that can work with it. I will try and do the gtk experiment soon. - <Luigi__> good luck then! :) btw, we shouldn't take this for an IRC channel :P